BS”D
TRANSCENDENTAL
TRIO: PARSHAT BESHALACH
Shira
Smiles Shiur 2016/5776
Summary
by Channie Koplowitz Stein
In Parshat Beshalach we meet Amalek, the avowed enemy of Bnei
Yisroel who
will torment us in every generation. As Bnei Yisroel left Egypt, tired
and
weak, they were attacked by the opportunistic army of Amalek who wanted
to wipe
Bnei Yisroel off the face of the earth. While this was a physical
attack,
Amalek attacks us in many forms throughout history, from military
attacks, to
political attacks, to religious attacks and any combination that will
further
their agenda. It is therefore important that we understand the strategy
involved in the counter attack both on a physical level and on a
symbolic level
so that we can continue to fight this war in every one of its
manifestations.
It is obvious from the plain reading of the text that this original war
was
waged on two fronts. The physical war was led by Joshua and fought on
the
ground, and the spiritual war was waged by Moshe sitting on a rock on a
hill
with his arms raised and supported by Aharon and Chur on either side of
him. Rashi identifies Chur as the son of Miriam, raising the
question,
why was it necessary to know who Chur was. Indeed, why do these three
represent
the spiritual forces that can defeat Amalek?
The Malbim explains that Aharon represented the unity of Bnei
Yisroel,
for he was known for his love of the people and his constant effort to
bring
peace among the people, even at the cost of telling little white lies.
Chur, on
the other hand, was the champion of the glory and honor of Hashem, as
he later
would die trying to prevent the sin of the golden calf. Moshe, in the
middle,
was the unifying factor, holding it all together. Rabbi Roberts further
clarifies this idea in Through the Prism of Torah. Bnei Yisroel
needed
the merit of these two men, Aharon representing the values of bein
adam
lechavero –
between man and his fellow man, and Chur representing the values of bein
adam laMakom –
between man and God. The goal is to synthesize these two qualities,
writes the
Chasam Sofer, for this will create blessings and joy. Taking his idea
from
Moshe’s
final
blessing to the Tribe of Asher, the Chasam Sofer writes that the key to
asher
–
being joyous
and blessed –
is in combining the softness and malleability of the oil in Asher’s
blessing with the
foundation of strong iron and copper beneath his feet. Moshe
represented this
synthesis, adds Rabbi Schwab in Mayein Beis Hashoeva. Whereas
for all
other battles, Moshe prayed alone, here, in the battle with Amalek,
Moshe
required both these attributes to join him.
Taking this interpretation of the two pronged battle one step further
into the
mystical realm, the Shvilei Pinchas writes that this was the
most
intense of all battles ever fought. Amalek tried to eradicate the
knowledge of
God’s
presence
in the world by the introduction of evil spirits that would shroud God’s
presence. These
three spirits were mashchit –
destroyer, af –
anger, and cheimah –
rage. If we note the first letter of each of these negative conditions,
we will
recognize the initials for Moshe, Aharon and Chur.
These
three men with their holiness were necessary to counteract the
influence of
those three evils. This is the threefold evil cited in Tehillim
78:38
and recited daily except on Shabbat before Maariv: “…
He forgives
iniquity and does not destroy; frequently He withdraws His anger,
and does not arouse His entire rage.”
While Amalek attacked almost immediately after we left Egypt, it
was a
particular philosophical question that triggered the attack. Bnei
Yisroel
asked, “Is
Hashem truly within us, or not?”
It was this slight doubt in Hashem’s
complete involvement in Bnei Yisroel that presented Amalek with the
opening to
attack Bnei Yisroel, for the mission of Amalek is to cast doubt into
our faith,
writes Meor Vashemesh. Therefore Moshe’s
uplifted hands were the guideposts to send the eyes of Bnei Yisroel
toward
heaven and strengthen their faith.
Where did this doubt originate? Rabbi Tatz discusses this very question
in Worldmask.
The element of doubt was brought into the world the moment Adam ate of
the Tree
of Knowledge of Good and Evil. Notice that it was not a tree of pure
evil; that
would be relatively easy to fight. But the fruit of the tree contained
an
admixture of good and evil so that it was difficult to separate them
and
determine what was good and what was evil. Then Hashem starts playing
by Adam’s
rules, so to
speak, as if He doesn’t
know everything. “Ayekah
- Where are you,”
“Hamin
hoetz –
did you eat of the tree …?”
In fact, that very
question word hamin (is …
of ... the)
constitutes the name of our arch enemy HaMaN who
tried to
destroy us who are the witnesses to God’s
presence in the world. Haman is the descendent of Amalek whose mission
it is to
create and maintain a schism between Bnei Yisroel and God and thereby
eradicate
knowledge of God from humanity.
Let us see who is the father of Amalek. It is none other than Elifaz,
son of
Esau, whom Esau had sent to kill Yaakov as Yaakov fled to Laban’s
house. Elifaz
faced a moral dilemma, explains Rabbi Chaim Shmuelevits in Sichot
Mussar.
Should he obey his father and murder Yaakov, or should he obey God and
not
murder? It is only in this kind of intermingling of good and evil that
evil can
flourish, when there is a total loss of clarity, for evil incarnate is
immediately recognizable and not given credibility.
Let us return now to our trio on the hill, fighting the battle in
heaven. Not
only do these three represent three who led Bnei Yisroel out of Egypt,
Moshe,
Aharon, and Chur as Miriam’s
representative, writes Oznayim LaTorah, but they also represent
the
three pillars that sustain the world, Torah, avodah, and gemilat
chasadim writes the Aish Hatamid of Rav Druck. Moshe brought
the
Torah down from Sinai, Aharon the Priest performed the avodah
in the
Sanctuary, and Chur represented his mother Miriam who constantly
performed act
of chessed from saving Jewish babies to watching over the infant Moshe
and in
whose merit we had water in the desert for forty years.
Rabbi Wolbe in Aleh Shor now explains the question Bnei Yisroel
asked
that precipitated Amalek’s
attack. The question was not does Hashem exist. Rather the question was
does
Hashem exist as a practical part of my life, or is His Torah merely
theoretical
and philosophical? Amalek, the grandson of Esau, inherited the DNA that
would
confine Torah to theological and intellectual discussion. After all,
Esau was
intellectually immersed in Torah. He asked deep questions. In fact, his
head is
buried in Meorat Hamachpelah precisely for this reason. But he
never let
the principles within the Torah guide his actions or he would not have
sold the
birthright for a bowl of soup. But Torah must not remain purely
intellectual.
We must internalize it, writes Rabbi Schorr in Halekach Vehalibuv.
We
must strive to be a talmid chacham, a constant student of the
truth in
Torah, and merit becoming a ben Torah, a metaphorical son of
our Torah
teachers. It was therefore imperative that Bnei Yisroel look upward
from Moshe’s
hands to heaven
so that the struggle of good against evil becomes an emotional struggle
rather
than an intellectual one, writes Rabbi Mordechai Mizrahi in Birkat
Mordechai.
It is equally imperative that we continue to look heavenward in our
daily
struggles.
Our Torah must impact our lives. The purpose of prayer is to bring us
closer to
Hashem and to a stronger faith that we can do nothing on our own, but
we must
rely constantly on Hashem, writes Rabbi Rabinowitz in Tiv Hatorah.
Interestingly, Esau had the logo of a serpent on his thigh, notes Rabbi
Brazile
in Bishvili Nivra Haolam. The serpent was cursed that he should
eat of
the dust of the earth. Because the dust is ubiquitous, the serpent
would never
need to pray to Hashem and would never develop a relationship with Him.
Esau
and his descendents Amalek, as the serpent, remain aloof and haughty.
In fact,
the numerical equivalent of Amalek
is 240,
equal to that of ram, haughty.
That’s
why
Moshe’s
hands
had to be raised above his head, explains Rabbi Tatz. Hands symbolize
action,
and as the people who accepted the Torah at Sinai, we profess that we
will do, naaseh,
before nishma, whether or not we understand with our heads. Esau’s
attitude is
always leading with the head, what’s
in it for me. As long as the hands were higher than the head, Bnei
Yisroel
prevailed, but if the head and the ego led the way, Bnei Yisroel would
falter.
Rabbi Nissan Alpert notes that in our expression chessed
precedes emes.
He explains that if we put emes, truth, first, we introduce
doubt into
our actions with questions like, haven’t
you done enough already, or why bother getting involved? One will never
get to chessed
that way. The hands and action must go first.
It is in this context that Halekach Vehalebuv explains why
Moshe
supported himself by sitting on an even, a rock. Rabbi Schorr
notes that
the three Hebrew letters that spell out e-v-en
are an acronym for the three tractates that one should study if he
hopes to
become a righteous person: Avot –
Ethics of our Fathers which
focuses on interpersonal/ social relationships, Berachot
–
which focuses on
our relationship with Hakodosh Boruch Hu and thanking Him for all that
we have,
and Nezikin –
Damages which teaches respect for the property of others. These are the
constant battles of Amalek: Do I need to acknowledge Hashem? Do I need
to
respect the rights and the property of others? Let me lift my hands and
show
you that they are clean and pure in all my dealings.
The Alshich Hakadosh offers yet another homiletic
interpretation to this
trio. Moshe understood that he would need to tap into the merit of our
forefathers to succeed in this battle. Therefore, the three on the hill
were
representative of those original three. Moshe himself represented
Yaakov,
absolute and complete truth and of perfection in his family. But citing
only
Yaakov, Moshe feared, would not be enough to bring success in his
battle. He
needed both Avraham and Yitzchak alongside him. However, Avraham had
the
imperfect Yishmael along with the righteous Yitzchak, while Yitzchak
himself
fathered the evil Esau. To counter these, Moshe drafted Aharon who,
through his
own constant service of chessed, would negate the influence of
Yishmael
and perfect the chessed of Avraham. Similarly, Chur would be
the
counterbalance to the evil Esau who misused the gevurah
(strength,
power, valor) Yitzchak represented. Moshe could thus draw on the merit
of our
forefathers without also involving their evil offspring.
Rav Reiss takes this image one step further. When Bilaam was forced to
bless
Bnei Yisroel instead of cursing them, he says, “For
from its origins I see it rock-like, and from hills do I see it.”
Our Sages
interpret the rocks to refer to our patriarchs while the hills refer to
our matriarchs.
Now, when Bnei Yisroel was in an existential battle with Amalek, Moshe
would
invoke the merit of our righteous patriarchs and matriarchs. He went up
on the
hill and they put a rock under him, symbolically supporting Moshe’s
prayers with
those of our ancestors. The redemption, writes the Sefas Emes,
will
always come through the merit of our Matriarchs, even when the
merit of
the patriarchs has ended.
The parsha ends with the promise that Hashem will erase the memory – a(e)mcheh
- of Amalek from under the heavens. The Vilna Gaon reads that word, emcheh
–
I will
erase- as an acronym for our deliverers from each exile. Our deliverers
from
Egyptian exile were Aharon, Moshe, Chur and Hashem.
The principals in the redemption from the Babylonian (segued into
Persian)
exile were (A)Esther, Mordechai, Charbonah
and Hashem.
Our final redemption will be through Eliyahu, Moshiach,
eight (ch)
princes and Hashem. At that time, with Hashem guiding us, we
will have
vanquished the evil forces of Amalek. May it be speedily, in our day.